Skip to main content

Short answer: Every crypto ETN (exchange-traded note) is issued by a company, and because an ETN is a debt security rather than a fund, that company’s identity and financial strength are part of the risk you take on. In Europe, where most crypto ETNs and ETPs trade, the major issuers are 21Shares, CoinShares, WisdomTree, VanEck, Bitwise Europe, Virtune, and Valour (the ETP arm of Nasdaq-listed DeFi Technologies). No single issuer is “best” — they compete on fees, backing structure, staking, and which exchanges they list on. What makes one of them unusual for stock investors is that it’s publicly traded, so you can actually read its financials.

Why the issuer matters more with an ETN than with a fund #

Before naming names, it helps to understand what you’re buying. If you’re new to the wrapper, start with what an ETN is and how it differs from a fund in ETN vs ETF.

The short version: an ETN is a note — a debt instrument issued by a company that promises to pay you a return linked to an underlying asset (say, bitcoin or Solana). You are, in effect, an unsecured or collateralized creditor of that issuer. That’s different from a traditional fund, where you own a slice of a pool of assets held by an independent custodian. The distinction is spelled out in more detail in ETP vs ETF, but the practical upshot is simple: with an ETN, if the issuer or a key counterparty fails, your claim can be impaired even if the underlying crypto did fine.

Most European crypto products mitigate this by being physically backed — the issuer holds the actual coins with a third-party custodian, so the note is collateralized 1:1. Others use synthetic structures, where the exposure is delivered through swaps or tracker mechanics rather than held coins. Neither is automatically safer; what matters is understanding which one you own and who stands behind it. Because every one of these products is legally a debt security, issuer and counterparty strength applies to all of them — which is exactly why knowing the companies behind the tickers is worth your time.

Who are the major crypto ETP and ETN issuers? #

Here’s a neutral tour of the main players you’ll encounter on European exchanges. Fees and features change, so always confirm on the issuer’s own materials before buying.

21Shares — One of the largest and best-known crypto ETP issuers, based in Switzerland, with a broad catalog spanning single-asset and basket products. It often runs multiple lines for the same asset at different price points (for example, both a lower-fee and a higher-fee Solana product), and its physically backed products commonly pass through staking rewards.

CoinShares — A long-established European digital-asset firm and, on fees, frequently the aggressive leader. Its physically backed Solana product, for instance, carries a headline 0.00% fee and passes through staking — genuinely hard to beat on cost. Where a competitor leads, it’s only fair to say so, and on SOL, CoinShares does.

WisdomTree — A large, diversified ETF issuer (well known to US investors for its traditional funds) that also offers crypto ETPs in Europe, typically physically backed with mid-range fees and staking on assets that support it.

VanEck — Another global asset manager with a European crypto ETP line-up. Its products tend to sit at the higher end on fees for some assets while still offering staking where applicable.

Bitwise Europe — The European crypto ETP business (formerly ETC Group) associated with the Bitwise brand, offering physically backed products across major assets at competitive-to-mid fees.

Virtune — A Swedish regulated crypto ETP issuer, listed primarily on Nasdaq Stockholm, offering staked single-asset products aimed at Nordic investors.

Valour — The ETP-issuer subsidiary of DeFi Technologies. Valour lists roughly 100 crypto ETPs across European venues including Euronext Paris and Amsterdam, Börse Frankfurt, Nasdaq Stockholm, and Spotlight. Its structures vary by product: some are physically backed, while others — such as its Solana lines — are synthetic tracker certificates hedged 1:1, using tier-one custodians such as Copper and Komainu. Valour’s Swedish-krona Solana line has traded since around September 2021, which makes it one of the longest-running Solana ETPs in Europe. On pure cost, its Solana products (1.9%, no staking pass-through) sit above cheaper staked rivals — a clear example of why comparing issuer-by-issuer matters.

Comparison of major crypto ETP/ETN issuers #

IssuerNotable products / assetsBacking styleListings / regionPublicly traded?
21SharesBroad multi-asset range; multiple SOL linesMostly physicalEurope (Switzerland-based)No
CoinSharesCost-leading SOL (0.00% + staking), BTC/ETHMostly physicalEuropeYes (Nasdaq Stockholm)
WisdomTreeBTC, ETH, SOL and morePhysicalEurope (+ global ETF brand)Yes (parent, NYSE)
VanEckSingle-asset crypto ETPsPhysicalEurope (+ global manager)No (private)
Bitwise EuropePhysically backed majorsPhysicalEuropeVia Bitwise (private)
VirtuneStaked single-asset ETPsPhysicalNasdaq StockholmNo
Valour (DeFi Technologies)~100 ETPs; SOL line since Sep 2021Physical and syntheticEuronext, Frankfurt, Stockholm, SpotlightYes (Nasdaq: DEFT)

A note on the table: “publicly traded” here means the issuer or its parent has shares you can buy. Several have public parents, but DeFi Technologies is the one whose business is built primarily around crypto ETP issuance, which makes its filings an unusually direct window into the economics of this niche.

The one issuer you can analyze like a stock #

For a stock investor, DeFi Technologies (Nasdaq: DEFT) is interesting precisely because you don’t have to guess at its financial strength — you can read it. DeFi Technologies, explained covers the structure, but the headline is that it files publicly, so the numbers behind Valour are on the record.

As an illustration of how you’d assess issuer strength: DeFi Technologies’ Q2 2026 results reported total revenue of $7.8 million (down from $13.1 million a year earlier) and an operating loss of $(2.3) million, against a balance sheet of roughly $135 million in combined cash, treasury, and venture assets with effectively zero debt. Valour’s average assets under management were $471.5 million for the quarter with positive net inflows of $22.8 million. CEO Johan Wattenström framed it plainly in the release: “Q2 was another challenging quarter for digital asset markets… we continued to make meaningful progress.” You can read the full Q2 2026 results breakdown for the bull and bear case.

That transparency cuts both ways. The same public disclosures show DEFT is a speculative micro-cap: its shares traded around $0.47–0.50 in mid-August 2026, down roughly 83–84% from their 52-week high, and it has ongoing regulatory items including a delayed 2025 annual filing and a shareholder-approved reverse-split authorization to maintain Nasdaq’s $1 minimum listing price. The point isn’t that a public issuer is safer — it’s that you can see the risks instead of inferring them. For the underlying facts, DeFi Technologies’ Q2 press release and its newsroom are the primary sources.

FAQ #

Are all crypto ETNs issued by the same kind of company? No. Issuers range from crypto-native specialists (21Shares, CoinShares, Bitwise Europe, Virtune, Valour) to large traditional asset managers with a crypto line (WisdomTree, VanEck). Their structures, fees, and staking policies differ product by product.

Does a bigger or public issuer mean lower risk? Not automatically. Size and public listing improve transparency and can signal resources, but an ETN is still a debt security carrying issuer and counterparty risk regardless of the issuer’s profile. Read the specific product’s backing and custody terms.

What’s the difference between physical and synthetic backing? Physically backed products hold the actual coins with a custodian, collateralizing the note 1:1. Synthetic products deliver exposure through swaps or tracker mechanics. Both are legitimate; the risks simply differ, so know which one you own.

Which issuer is cheapest? It depends on the asset. On Solana, for example, CoinShares has offered a 0.00% fee with staking pass-through, while other issuers range higher. Always compare fees per specific product, not per issuer overall.

Why can I buy shares in DeFi Technologies but not most other issuers? Because DeFi Technologies is itself listed on Nasdaq (ticker DEFT). Most crypto ETP issuers are private or are subsidiaries of privately held groups, so their financials aren’t directly investable or fully public.

Not financial advice. Capital at risk. DeFi Technologies (Nasdaq: DEFT) is a speculative micro-cap; the figures above are illustrative of how issuer financial strength can be assessed, not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.